SEO Portfolio
Proof Semantics Brief Audit Case Contact
Prepared specifically for 6 Weeks Marketing · Noindex enabled

SEO Work Samples

Semantic research, SEO content brief, technical audit logic, real reporting screenshots and an anonymized case study — focused on the exact approach requested in the recruitment process.

12+years in SEO
TechnicalSEO + WordPress
US · AU · EUinternational markets

What this portfolio is designed to show

Not confidential client details. Not theory. The purpose is to show how I structure SEO work: research, clustering, technical diagnosis, page-level briefs, reporting and business-oriented interpretation.

01

Semantic structure

Categories, subcategories, search intent, page types and priorities.

02

SEO brief

Title, description, H1/H2, content blocks, schema and internal links.

03

Reporting

Search Console and Ahrefs-style reporting with growth dynamics and GEO distribution.

04

Case thinking

Challenge → actions → result, without exposing client-sensitive data.

Real Reporting Screenshots

The screenshots are anonymized examples of SEO monitoring and reporting. They demonstrate the type of data I work with: clicks, impressions, CTR, positions, country distribution, authority, referring domains, organic traffic and keyword growth.

Google Search Console 6-month growth chart
Search Console performance6-month growth trend: clicks, impressions, CTR and average position.
Google Search Console country distribution
International SEO distributionTraffic and impressions across the US, Australia, France, Canada, UK, Poland and Germany.
Technical SEO health metrics
Technical SEO healthHealth score, DR, referring domains, organic traffic and organic keyword indicators.
Ahrefs organic growth report
Organic growth trackingAuthority, referring domains, organic traffic, keywords and traffic by location.

Semantic Core Example

Example for an automotive accessories project. The goal is to turn raw keywords into a content map that supports rankings, internal linking and business priorities.

ClusterSubclusterSample queriesVolume (avg)IntentPage typePriority
Retractable tonneau coversRetrax modelsretrax pro xr, retrax pro mx, retrax one mx review10K–40KCommercialModel reviewHigh
Hard folding coversBAKFlipbakflip mx4, bakflip mx4 review, bakflip vs retrax10K–50KCommercial investigationReview / comparisonHigh
Vehicle fitmentFord F-150best tonneau cover for f150, f150 bed cover, ford f150 truck bed cover50K–100KTransactionalLanding pageHigh
Buying guidesWeather and securityare tonneau covers waterproof, secure truck bed cover, best cover for snow5K–20KInformationalGuide articleMedium
ComparisonsBrand vs brandretrax vs roll n lock, lomax vs bakflip, peragon vs retrax10K–30KCommercial investigationComparison articleHigh
InstallationHow-tohow to install tonneau cover, retrax installation, tonneau cover problems5K–15KInformationalHow-to articleMedium
Problem solvingWater / noise / fittonneau cover leaking, tonneau cover wind noise, tonneau cover not closing2K–8KInformationalTroubleshooting contentMedium
Best-of pagesUse casesbest retractable tonneau cover, best hard tonneau cover, best tonneau cover for work truck30K–80KCommercialBest-of guideHigh

SEO Content Brief Example

A structured brief for a commercial-investigation page targeting a high-volume product review query in the automotive accessories niche.

Target keywordRetrax Pro XR Review
Search intentCommercial investigation
Recommended URL/retrax-pro-xr-review/
Target length2,500+ words

Metadata & headings

Title: Retrax Pro XR Review: Pros, Cons & Real-World Experience

Description: Detailed Retrax Pro XR review covering build quality, installation, security, compatibility, pricing and alternatives.

H1: Retrax Pro XR Review: Is It Worth the Price in 2025?

H2 examples: Key Features & Build Quality · Installation Process · Pros and Cons · Retrax Pro XR vs BakFlip MX4 · Who Should Buy It · FAQ

Page structure

  1. Overview
  2. Key features
  3. Installation process
  4. Pros and cons
  5. Retrax Pro XR vs BakFlip MX4
  6. Who should buy it
  7. FAQ

SEO requirements

FAQ schema, product schema, compressed WebP images, descriptive ALT tags, internal links to model reviews, best-of guides and comparison pages.

Technical SEO Audit Sample

Findings are triaged by impact, urgency and implementation difficulty — this prevents cosmetic work from crowding out changes that actually move organic growth.

FindingImpactUrgencyDifficultyStatus
Redirect chains & 404 cleanupHighCriticalLowFixed
Indexation & sitemap cleanupHighCriticalLowFixed
Core Web Vitals & image optimizationHighMediumMediumIn progress
Internal linking depth analysisHighMediumMediumFixed
Duplicate metadata cleanupMediumMediumLowFixed
Schema markup validationMediumMediumLowFixed
Robots.txt & crawlability reviewMediumLowLowFixed
Thin & overlapping content reviewMediumLowHighIn progress

Anonymized SEO Case Study

A compact case format showing the logic I use when presenting SEO work: what was wrong, what was done and what changed.

01

Challenge

Content-heavy website with fragmented architecture, weak internal linking, inconsistent metadata and limited visibility across commercial clusters.

02

Actions

Technical audit, semantic expansion, content cluster map, SEO briefs, metadata optimization, internal linking rebuild, comparison pages and reporting framework.

03

Result

Organic clicks grew from ~1,200 to 10,000/month over 6 months. Impressions up from ~80K to 1.42M. Average position improved from 24 to 7.8. Health score raised to 94.

8.3×click growth (1.2K → 10K/mo)
1.42Mimpressions at peak
7.8avg position (was 24)
94health score (was 61)